Archive for the ‘rants’ Category

Why people (including me) aren’t ready for today’s “DTV Switch”

June 12, 2009

This started out as a comment to this article on Techdirt, but it got so long, I decided it deserved to be it’s own blog post.

Here in Oregon about 40% of people still used solely terrestrial TV prior to the push for DTV switch (haven’t seen any numbers on how many people fell for the cable / satellite providers propaganda that they are the way to switch to digital.)  Sat. coverage is much worse than on the East coast and there are still many areas (even in cities) where you either can’t get cable or have to pay to have the cable brought for blocks or miles to your house.  I live in your average built in the 40’s type city/suburban neighborhood.  I know we didn’t HAVE cable in our neighborhood when I moved in ~5 years ago and was pricing cable internet vs DSL.  They’d bring it in, but forget the “free installation by 5 o’clock today!” offers…

If the FTC and local stations had actually cared about people converting, they would have put build your own Hoverman antenna shows on (like, oh, Make TV did), not the endless crawlers and shows about how to buy an antenna.  90% of the people I know who still have only broadcast TV have the supplies in their home to build a simple Hoverman antenna variation and know someone who could have helped them with it if they couldn’t do it themselves.  Most of them don’t have $50 for a commercial antenna plus someone to install it in their attic.

The reality though is that the test environment – and even the supposedly real environment here today in Portland Oregon, a reasonably large TV market, on the first day of “Digital Only” broadcast TV DOES NOT MATCH the actual long term production broadcast environment.  That doesn’t start til tomorrow.  So should you throw money at a problem that might be fixed (or fixable for less) when the real environment comes on line?  Or wait?  When the penalty is that you might have to listen to the radio, read the paper, or use the internet for a few days to get your news and entertainment, clearly waiting for the real environment is a big win!

I got a converter box over a year ago when they first became inexpensively available and we actually had stations broadcasting.  Even with a powered antenna booster, the only digital station I could reliably get was the local 24 hour weather station – if I put the antenna in a location where I got no analog stations.  (Of course, in the middle of the night, I had digital stations, but I’m generally more interested in sleeping than watching TV at 3 am.)  At that point I’d spent as much as I was willing to on TV, so I figured I’d watch the analog stations ’til they disappeared then switch to Hulu.com etc for all my TV viewing. 

Apparently our ABC affiliate is switching to the UHF spectrum on 6/13 and since I find their news reasonably useful/entertaining (and my husband is going into TV withdrawal), I figure I’ll give the converter box/antenna another try when they do that.  If that fails, then I’ll probably salvage parts from my rabbit ears and junk in my garage to build this.  But if I have to spend money every month, give me more general purpose internet bandwidth, not TV!

See also Which Gray-Hoverman TV Antenna Should I Build

Blogged with the Flock Browser
Advertisement

Shred Day – or yet another example of counter-productive security

May 11, 2007

Today is once again “Shred Day” at one of our local TV stations – KGW Northwest NewsChannel 8.  They do this every month or two, to help prevent identity theft”.  You can bring up to 2 boxes of personal or confidential documents to be shredded and recycled.  It’s a great idea and a nice service, except for one thing – they actually put a “shred cam” in the shredder, either as documents are coming out of the strip cutter or, like today, in the hopper of documents to be shred!  Yes, they are actually broadcasting film of people’s confidential documents in a readable form during the newscast!  From glancing at the TV from across the room I could determine the general nature of some of the documents!  I’m sure that if I’d recorded the broadcast, I could have reconstructed several of the documents.  So, here are people trying to protect their documents and instead, they are being broadcast throughout Oregon and Southwest Washington.  Not to mention, that if I want to steal people’s personal information, which sounds like more fun – picking through trash hoping to get lucky and find something, or sitting at my computer reconstructing documents the owners were trying to protect from their video images.

technorati tags:, , , ,

Blogged with Flock

Boobie-Thon 2006 and Vendor T-Shirts

October 1, 2006

Boobiethon Banner

My service dog, Pico, having no modesty; has put up a picture of her nipples on her blog in honor of Boobie-Thon 2006.

I did send in a photo, but I’m a lot more modest than Pico! I was going to wear a vendor t-shirt, but

<rant alert>

I have NO vendor t-shirts in my size – NONE! I am not an XL. I am not an XXL. I’m not even a L. I wear a S or XS t-shirt. A size M is comfortably baggy. Anything larger and I can wear it is a dress – not, however a work friendly dress. And definitely not an attractive dress. My boyfriend is getting sick of seeing me drinking my coffee in the morning in shapeless vendor t-shirts – for that matter, my rabbit wishes I’d run out of them and switch back to a robe because he likes to chew on the hem. Hey, a woman’s t-shirt would be even better – oh, wait, everyone in IT is male and size XL. Don’t vendors think it would be better advertising if the t-shirts they sent out actually looked good on people?

I used to have a Xylogics t-shirt in my size, but it wore out. Vendors – think how many times I had to wear that shirt for it to literally fall apart in the wash one day, don’t you wish it was YOUR company getting that advertising?

</rant>